论文标题
分类生态系统不受益受并将其效果与中国北京的生态系统服务进行比较
Classifying ecosystem disservices and comparing their effects with ecosystem services in Beijing, China
论文作者
论文摘要
为了完全了解城市生态系统的影响，应将生态系统偏离的影响与生态系统服务一起考虑，并需要更多的研究注意力。在这项研究中，我们试图通过使用级联流程图和分类系统来更好地理解其形成，并将其效果与生态系统服务进行比较。在理解生态系统对人类福祉的负面影响方面，区分最终和中间生态系统的不利影响至关重要。提议的EDS功能分类（即配置，调节和文化EDS）也应有助于更好地桥接ED和ES研究。此外，我们将北京用作案例研究区域来重视由城市生态系统引起的ED，并将发现与ES值进行比较。结果表明，尽管EDS造成了巨大的财务损失，但生态系统服务的潜在经济增益仍然大大超过了损失。我们的研究仅阐明了评估城市生态系统的净影响。将来，我们认为，在生态系统评估研究中应至少同样考虑EDS估值，以制定更全面和可持续的发展政策，土地使用建议和管理计划。
To completely understand the effects of urban ecosystems, the effects of ecosystem disservices should be considered along with the ecosystem services and require more research attention. In this study, we tried to better understand its formation through the use of cascade flowchart and classification systems and compare their effects with ecosystem services. It is vitally important to differentiate final and intermediate ecosystem disservices for understanding the negative effects of the ecosystem on human well-being. The proposed functional classification of EDS (i.e. provisioning, regulating and cultural EDS) should also help better bridging EDS and ES studies. In addition, we used Beijing as a case study area to value the EDS caused by urban ecosystems and compare the findings with ES values. The results suggested that although EDS caused great financial loss the potential economic gain from ecosystem services still significantly outweigh the loss. Our study only sheds light on valuating the net effects of urban ecosystems. In the future, we believe that EDS valuation should be at least equally considered in ecosystem valuation studies to create more comprehensive and sustainable development policies, land use proposals and management plans.
